Beware! We’re losing people to the internet! Danger! Outlaw parents are banning together to run “black market childcare” group! Warning! Dangerous “sovereign citizens” (an oxymoron) question government authority and ask police annoying questions about the law! Alert! Alert! They would just as soon as shoot you or blow up your home as pass you a leaflet explaining your rights… or that’s what the increasingly bizarre and shrill TV news and print media would have us believe. (Never mind that a “citizen” can’t be a “sovereign.”)
As I write, I ponder the number of facepalm moments I have endured of late thanks to mainstream (cabal) media, and things seem to have escalated way out of hand.
“The System,” as some of us call it, is ramping up efforts to control and curtail, and ultimately eliminate any and all forms of unapproved, uncontrolled, non-monitored, untaxable activity anyone may even be thinking of engaging in – and watch it, because just THINKING about off-the-books babysitting will be a thought crime before you know it! You’ve been warned, all you cunning black market childcare terrorist nannies!
A 2005 parliamentary inquiry heard evidence that the black market in childcare could be worth as much as $6 billion.
A spokeswoman for the ATO said they monitored cash economy industries such as in-home care, but had not done a targeted crackdown on nannies. [That is obviously now changing, albeit ten years on.]
“There is nothing wrong with paying a nanny in cash as long as the householder meets their obligations for superannuation and pay as you go tax, and as long as the nanny declares the income,’’ the spokeswoman said.
This isn’t new, as the 2005 reference shows, but the overtly Orwellian media overtones arise of late in parallel with the determined efforts (primarily via TV) to demonise individuals who attempt to assert or preserve and act upon their sovereignty in other areas of life (like travelling on roads, for instance, and having to fend off parasitic and predatory highway patrol cops who have revenue raising quotas to meet). The name of the game is Control – “of what?” you ask. Of everything. (And everything is – or should be – a taxable/profitable commodity, by the way.)
Every single facet of human existence is to be transparent (to the State), documentable, verifiable, quantifiable, paperworked, signed off on, legislated, supervised, scrutinized, and preferably taxed – for the good of the nation, you see. You can’t trust anyone…except for the State, of course. It loves you and only wants the best for you (unless you ask questions, in which case you’re obviously an extremist.)
The situation has deteriorated on the “terrorist nannies” front because of the recently passed “no jab, no pay” legislation, which is a truly Orwellian fascist piece of legislation if ever there was one. It deliberately targets more informed/curious/untrusting parents who still need financial assistance, effectively using extortion to bend them to the State’s will. “Vaccinate your child or we cut off your pay.” Needless to say, this has prompted a public outcry from those who are not yet completely zombified by pharmaceutical/government propaganda, and people with backbone have understandably begun to take matters into their own hands (it’s called having initiative/nous).
With welfare cut, childcare services become out of reach for many of the financially challenged parents targeted by the “jab” legislation. The intelligent response? To communicate and network with each other and organize child-minding groups among themselves, thereby eliminating the tyrannical “middle man” (the System). There used to be a word for this kind of a social dynamic – you may remember it: community, or, as Big Brother prefers to think of it, the
‘frightening’ practice of underground anti-vaxxer childcare2
That’s right, folks, via “black market childcare”, “anti-vaxxers” are providing “hotbeds” for disease and radicalization in their suburban terror cells of loopy “freedom of choice” and “self-determination” ideology. Clearly, these extremists who don’t automatically bow to presumed government authority medical dogma are a security threat to the nation and should be shipped to Guantanamo ASAP. Or should we just bring back the good ol’ fashioned lynch mob and have some fun? You know, teach those independent thinkers what kind of trouble asking questions and researching independently can get you in. That’ll learn ’em.
Basically, as a civilian/ordinary mum or dad, organizing your own “daycare” or “play group” is potentially a radicalist/extremist activity and should rightly be administered by a trusted guardian – our beloved government in this case. That would be double-plus good.
Rest Easy, the State has the Answers for Us
Need a babysitter at short notice? No trouble at all! The State permits you total unrestrained freedom to hire whoever you choose – as long as they are in the State’s database of approved (controlled, quantified, accounted-for, and TAXABLE) nannies. Now, let’s return to one particular sentence quoted above: “There is nothing wrong with paying a nanny in cash as long as the householder meets their obligations for superannuation and pay as you go tax, and as long as the nanny declares the income.”
Question: Can anyone show us any lawful and legally enforceable CONTRACT between the householder and the government whereby such conditions are stipulated and agreed to by said householder? No? I didn’t think so. And can someone please demonstrate in black and white showing proof of the claim that the “householder” has any such superannuation “obligations,” or that the “nanny” has a lawful obligation to “declare” their “income”? No? I suspected as much. In point of fact, tax in Australia is voluntary, not lawfully enforceable (same as the USA). Can the government demonstrate at LAW that it has any authority at all over living men and women who do not consent? Hmmm…
Moreover, have we stopped to consider the very MEANINGS of the terminology used here? Have you looked in a law dictionary for “income,” “nanny,” “householder,” etc.? And how do you know if you even ARE a “householder”? Could it be that you only become one by VOLUNTEERING to/implied consent? How do you define “income”? Does the legal definition and government’s usage of this terminology serve you or does it serve the government? Qui bono?
Even the most quotidian of human activities is utterly unacceptable to the State if we are not fully trackable, traceable, and able to quantify and account for every little facet of said activity along the way. It makes us safer, don’t you see? Want to grab some organic produce from the markets on the weekend? You’ll need a license and rego, thanks (and maybe a quick breath test along the way). You have complete freedom of movement, just as long as you move in precisely the State-prescribed way which has been predetermined as “acceptable,” of course.
And you’ll definitely need to cough up some serious cash for the privilege of a State-approved “vehicle” and “drivers license.” For your own safety, of course. And heaven forbid your registration should lapse for even a day, for did you not know that the INSTANT it does, you magically forget how to work the brake, your eyesight mysteriously degenerates, and you become an imminent danger to every living thing on or within a 500-metre radius of the road? Well, you do. This one time, a man whose rego had expired drove through a small country town, and the whole population contracted leprosy overnight. True story.
When is law not law? What if I told you that it’s all bollocks?
“I…have come to the conclusion that the current legal and political system in use in Australia and its States and Territories has no basis in law.” –Sir Harry Gibbs, former Chief Justice of the Australian High Court (right)
The police on the roads, however, have no regard for law, as they are merely policy enforcers/revenue raisers, and as such, have resorted to fining car owners who leave the windows down or the car unlocked while it’s “unattended” (as one unfortunate Byron Bay resident recently found out). You read that right. To “protect” the public, the police are now employed to carry out what is effectively State-sanctioned petty theft…against the public(!) Welcome to Australia.
Of course, asking questions has always been frowned upon by authority programs; you’re supposed to OBEY, not ask pesky QUESTIONS, you filthy heretic! Thou shalt not ask thy police officer the difference between a LAW and a STATUTE! Thou shalt not ask thy doctor whether rigorous and honest double-blind controlled trials have been conducted on the vaccines he endorses (or if he even knows what’s in them)! Thou shalt not ask the taxation department for proof of claim! How dare thou! Thou art to submit and be grateful for the privilege! (Now, shut up and eat your gruel.)
It seems that with the waning of the hypnotic spell of the Catholic church’s guilt complex (original sin, etc.), we have witnessed not the transcendence of such deleterious guilt programming, but the mere transference and dispersion of it into other areas of human life (virtually all of them, actually). For instance, look at the mind-boggling notion of church “indulgences” – basically a “pay your way to heaven” program that matched “sins” with an appropriate monetary value which the “sinner” paid the church to square things up with ol’ Yahweh and book a seat on the cloud. Now we instead pay the government income taxes for the privilege of lying endlessly to us and assaulting us and destroying our freedom in myriad different ways; we have the police on the roads fining us senseless for the privilege of exercising our “right to free travel,” and so forth. Here in the “Lucky Country”, we are lucky enough to just keep our heads above water with all this freedom inundating us. We pay the State to sate it and hopefully it will leave us alone; we used to pay our way out of “hell” or purgatory in advance, but now we pay our way out of jail time in advance! In the Lucky Country you’re basically guilty/sinful/criminal until redeemed by the saviour (no longer Christ, but our hard-earned cash).
We haven’t really outgrown religion, we have just adopted different kinds of modern, socially acceptable religion, which really all still come under the one original category of Blind Faith in External Authority (a.k.a. the “External Authority” program). This program manifests in many ways that are highly transparent in today’s world if you have relatively educated eyes.
Here are a few forms this mass-hypnosis takes:
- Believe in and get your vaccines…or “burn in hell” (be smeared and demonised)
Guilt mechanism: if you don’t you’ll be responsible for putting your child “at risk” and breeding “preventable diseases,” thus compromising “herd immunity.” (No one ever seems to stop and consider whether there may be FAR more effective ways of preventing disease, and, perhaps more to the point, why don’t pro-vaxxers have a good answer as to how their “protected” child is put in such danger through contact with an unvaxxed kid? Also, thou shalt not ask for the evidence behind “herd immunity.”)
- Pay your taxes
We need them for roads, hospitals, and schools. We really need the roads so we can get your kids to school to be brainwashed, get you to work so you can be a wage slave, and get you/your children to hospital when you inevitably get sick from the stress and toxicity of life in the Matrix. (Also, please don’t research where public monies REALLY go, don’t look into deep underground military bases or geoengineering; don’t research contract law, common law, sovereignty, birth certificates, or ever attempt to understand anything about life EVER.)
Guilt mechanism: surely you wouldn’t even THINK of depriving the elderly of the “care” they need, or of depriving those sweet little children of an “education”! Bastard! We all need to “pay our fair share” and “pitch in.” I’m paying MY taxes, so who do you think you are not to? You think you’re better than me?”
- Send your kids to (a mainstream) school and never EVER home school
Guilt mechanism: Only the State is fit to decide which information is appropriate for your child to be aware of. Parents are clearly the LAST people who should attempt to connect their child with meaning and reality. Where is your certificate, peasant? If you take your kids out of school, you’re robbing them of their future! (Translation: we can’t brainwash them and control their thought patterns nearly as effectively if they aren’t sitting in State-approved classrooms for 6+ hours a day. And only terrorists who like abusing small animals would ever even THINK of sending their kid to a Steiner school where their development, maturation and mental and emotional faculties will be allowed to unfold naturally in a creative, conducive environment. [Wait for it: Steiner schools will be deemed security threats and hotbeds of extremist ideology, and ultimately terror cells in future.])
- “License and papers, please.”
The right to free travel has been all but exterminated in the Nanny State known as Australia. One of the very hardest things to do here is simply travel freely – ask anyone who’s actually tried to make a habit of it! (Result: constant police harassment, fraudulent fines, unlawful kidnapping and arrest, physical assaults by police, unjust jail time, etc.)
Guilt mechanism: You’re immediately a threat to all others on the road if your car isn’t registered or you don’t have a State-approved driver’s license (sorry, didn’t realise I needed a LICENSE to do something completely lawful and harmless!). It’s intrinsically dangerous to use your car on the road for even a second without the relevant papers/approval. You don’t want to hurt or kill people, do you? (Of course not, there’s a good citizen, just pay the money and you can be on your [State-approved] way.)
All of the above belief structures that have the masses hypnotized are engineered to induce the individual to sever themselves from their innate locus of morality and common sense through the inculcation of neurosis, inferiority, and guilt complexes (State-sponsored mind viruses). Instead of self-determination (sovereignty) it is desirous that we are in fact gullible and conformist, as comedian Steve Hughes observes. That way the State can effortlessly induce us to do its bidding in the most insidious and absurd ways. That mind virus of neurotic conformity (or should we call it “confirmity“?) is also why the masses of people react so unconsciously – and emotively – over the above issues when someone has the audacity to step out of line and start asking awkward questions or pointing out facts that undermine the status quo.
The hypnotic effect of these belief structures being so deeply embedded as to be automatically taken for granted produces the hysterical emotional shutdown reaction or cognitive-overload-through-dissonance which renders most people non-functional and obedient State chattel, effectively. The bottom line is that in the hypnotized state, the sheer IDEA of even DARING to inquire as to the FACTS of the matter (a.k.a. “question authority” / deviate from established thought patterns or “cognitive creodes”) is so utterly UNTHINKABLE and OUTRAGEOUS that it is reflexively self-censored in the obedient government believer.
Is the State Psycho?
The State’s recent neurotic propaganda against so-called “sovereign citizens” (and “anti-vaxxers”) is a mirror of this mass neurosis and serves to heighten it. In fact, the State’s propaganda – as seen on the nightly news and in major print media – has shifted (devolved) to become so transparently hostile to documented reality and provable facts as to have become satire unto itself. It becomes challenging to satirise such overt paranoia, fallacy, and double-think.
For example, when the informed, peaceful rejection of State “authority” by someone such as John Wilson (an Australian man in his seventies who has been unlawfully harassed by banks, courts, and police for years now) is conflated in the very next breath with the Oklahoma City bombing of 1995, the relatively informed observer can only stand aghast and try to decide whether it is funny, scary, or if someone somewhere is just having us all on. The point of political satire is to caricature politics, media, and also ideology, but when the image in the TV “news” of a fairly unimpressive looking and quietly spoken elderly Australian man such as John Wilson is followed immediately by an image of the A.P. Murrah building in Oklahoma, USA, standing in ruins, with the overt suggestion (and commentary) that people like him who peacefully question the State’s presumed authority and control over us are liable at any moment to blow up public buildings, one wonders what creative “wiggle room” is actually left for the caricaturing?
We might as well point out that the overwhelming majority of well-known “terrorist attacks” are in fact orchestrated and funded by our loving Western governments. This is common knowledge to all serious researchers, but proving the point here will prove too taxing to too many attention spans. (You’re on the internet already – use it!)
The State attempts to terrorize the unwitting populace with images of people who consciously choose to reject authority. Why? Because the state is terror-fied by the pending loss of control over the public herd it has been duping and milking for so long. It’s the same old rule by fear tactic used by the Old Testament “god,” supplanted into new channels of thought, as the hypnotic influence of religion has worn away. The New Priesthood is, as many observers have noted, the (State-sponsored) Scientific Priesthood. Because we turn reflexively now to Science to explain the universe for us, the State has on its payroll a nearly inexhaustible supply of drone sellout “scientists” and clueless doctors who will tell us whatever the State needs us to believe to retain control. (Really, though, the bottom line is centralized State control, fueled by the collective HIVE-LIKE unconscious mind of somnambulant humanity.)
Fear mongering over Communism, AIDS, CO2-driven “global warming,” bird flu, swine flu, gun control, Al Qaeda and Muslim extremists, ISIS terrorists, the unvaccinated, and most recently, people who have learned their rights at law and seek to apply them to protect themselves from the aggression and predation of the State and its many zombie agents, a.k.a. the “sovereign citizens” who, we are told, could go on a killing spree at any minute. No one is safe if we aren’t ALL controlled and accounted for at all times by Big Brother. “Papers please.”
There are “scientists” of many stripes who might be called to comment on any of these issues to serve the State’s interests, and even when there isn’t a scientist, there’s always a talking celebrity head, or glorified panelist on some inane TV show to side with the Almighty State and ITS VERSION of “how life should be” and to demonise those who might dare to think for themselves and unshackle their lives from insidious and tyrannical state control. Lack of controllability means unpredictability, fear of the unknown (and importantly, loss of revenue). Nothing is more terror-fying for the State and its minions, so any avenue the curious citizen might venture down in order to encourage to new dendritic activity within their cranium and which might result in dangerous thoughts and ideations of living a life unoppressed by the Orwellian state must be quickly quashed and blocked from access, and if they can’t be blocked to access, then you demonise them so much as to make them unappealing avenues to venture down (“What will people think of me if I start talking about this stuff?”).
Is the Internet Radicalizing Us?
Look for the State apparatus seeking to intensely terror-form the public consciousness around the “threat” of unregulated information obtainable from that dangerously radicalizing entity known as the world wide web soon. It’s coming, and the “Elite” have been pondering the “problem” of the internet for some time now. The free flow of unregulated information that challenges the status quo is tremendously threatening to the State. The last thing we want is people asking questions…