…continued from Part 1…
“The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly – it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over.”
“Think of the press as a great keyboard on which the government can play.”
“Intellectual activity is a danger to the building of character.”
Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Propaganda Minister
5. Attack the messenger not the message. Ad hominem arguments are favourable when the evidence doesn’t support you.
You’ll want to target personalities rather than the substance of their message. Social media skirmishes are a great way to divert pro-choice people’s time and energy away from more constructive pursuits, and drag them down to the level of petty ego battles, hopefully baiting them into saying something juicy that you can screenshot and share with your anti-choice network and the media later, perhaps as bogus “Tweets.” (Hint: Follow the Hennessy Protocol [see Part 1] only if you’re willing to look like a complete fraud when the public starts to uncover the ruse.)
Ad hominem is a fundamental weapon in the pro-vax fundamentalist’s arsenal. Insults, threats, defamation, bullying, etc. are part and parcel of the modus operandi for militant pro-vaxxers and establishment trolls – and they love to work in teams. It’s a technique that seems designed to intimidate people into not saying anything in the first place. As this strategy becomes more aggressive and yet continues to fail (see: Jill Hennessy and co.), the vaccine establishment is ramping things up on all fronts (see: Jill and friends again).
5(a). Shame as a technique for social(ist) engineering.
As a good little Big Pharma stooge, you’ll want to create a culture of not just guilt, but shame. As one blogger who doesn’t deserve to be mentioned writes:
…we need to support a culture that shames its members for not vaccinating their kids — and by extension, for endangering their communities. Vaccination is a social issue, and therefore shame should regulate it.
That should probably read “socialist issue,” but you get the idea. The same author also falls back on the misleading claim that Wakefield’s “discredited” Lancet paper is the “movement’s modern founding text,” as if everything was just peachy before 1998, and admits “that I’m here to convince you that the best way to deal with anti-vaxxers is to ridicule their position so much that it’s no longer acceptable to say in polite company that vaccines cause autism.” (Where does that leave CDC whistleblower William Thompson then? No more dinner parties?)
I’ve always found “polite company” tends to be superficial anyway, so fuck that and the petty would-be engineers of a society that is 100% coercively/compulsorily vaccinated in a wonderful Orwellian Fascist Medical State. If these conformist zombies have their way, your last remaining shred of freedom (over your own body – and your children’s) will be destroyed.
6. Hypocrisy is golden.
As you bully, threaten, insult, defame, and intimidate your way to ontological glory, always blame the victim and accuse them of EXACTLY the tactics you yourself use (see comments on ridicule above). Witness this sorry example by Australian Skeptics vice-president, Rachael Dunlop who complains, “I’m frequently abused,” and yet, evidently doesn’t mind dishing out a bit herself. The following is a comment made on Twitter (notice the authentic screen shot, Jill?) towards Meryl Dorey, former president of the Australian Vaccination Network (AVN), who is quite a wonderful human being from what I can gather.
Ah, thanks, doctor. Lucky she’s not a GP with that attitude! Calling Dorey the “Bangalow baby killer” was also a nice touch (of petty, defamatory ad hominem hypocrisy).
Accusing pro-choice groups and anguished parents of fear mongering when they simply point out real risks and documented harm (or death) is fine, but even better if you can turn around and, in the next breath, scare the bejeezus out of people about “flu season” (see: Part 1 of this article) or some other low risk potential situation they’ll “need” to be vaccinated for.
Try not to notice what you’re doing. Psychological projection and censorship (of the self) are invaluable to this pursuit.
6(a). Trolls are good, mmkay? Moral exemptions are issued to all those aboard the pro-vax train. Anything goes!
To be the best vaccine troll you can be, you’ll want an anonymous Facebook profile from which you can spew your bile and disinformation without the burden of being identifiable and accountable, instead being a complete and utter coward, which is always preferable. Have several profiles and stalk those who challenge pro-vax dogma. Take screenshots of them and spread them around in a “name and shame” campaign of defamation and intimidation. Target nurses, doctors, and the laity, heaping scorn and ridicule on anyone who raises vaccine concerns. Justify this grotesque and psychologically violent activity as “necessary for the greater good.”
Gotta break an egg or two to make an omelette, eh?
The flip side of this line of thinking is that the peaceful, informed non-vaccinators who prefer a natural approach to immunity and health are perversely perceived as “dangerous” and “irresponsible.” Isn’t it more logical that the statist fanatics who do no research but aggressively and blindly promote the vaccine agenda/religion in the name of “herd immunity” no matter the cost are actually the dangerous ones? How many eggs need breaking before we realise the omelette was just a bad idea in the first place?
Natural health advocates aren’t the ones pushing for ultra-draconian mandatory vaccination (by 2020 in Australia) and they don’t have the influence and funds to push it through, nor to systemically economically freeze out or even physically kill off their competitors by the dozen like Big Pharma does (and has been doing recently, in case you didn’t notice!). Who benefits from mandaory vaccination? Big Pharma rakes in billions and the population control eugenicists also get their way (to a degree). (On this last note, NEVER mention Kevin Mugur Galalae’s books to people, let alone read them yourself.)
Finally, ALWAYS paint anyone raising questions or safety concerns about vaccines as irrational, no matter how many studies, doctors, or damaged families (or injured family members) they point to. The evidence is unworthy of your cherubic and venerable eyes. “The science is settled.”
Pay no attention, you have a flock/herd to tend to, O’ pious one.
Note: natural health advocates don’t push for draconian collectivist legislation to FORCE vaccination on their countrymen because they do not suffer the profoundly neurotic – and completely unnecessary – blanket fear of disease entertained by the vaccinists.
Could they understand a few things about protecting one’s immune system and being healthy that the mandatory vaxxers do not?
Might they know a few things about the true effectiveness of vaccines that the disease-fearful do not?
If the fear is optional, what might the remedy be, do you think?
7. Ignore Vaccine Court Payouts Resulting from Proven Vaccine Damage
It does your case no favours to acknowledge that over $3 BILLION (yes, billion) worth of compensatory payouts have been made in the US alone since 1986 to families who have had a loved one seriously injured or killed as a direct result of vaccination.
It also does the cause no good to talk about the immunity granted to all vaccine manufacturers in the US now, as vaccines are legally listed as “unavoidably unsafe.”
If their products are so safe, then why the $3 billion in damages paid out, and why would they need immunity from future law suits?
Are all those destroyed families hurting the profit margins?
Appendix C 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (Public Law 99-660)
42 USC 300aa-22.
(b) Unavoidable Adverse Side Effects; Warnings.—
(1) No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after the effective date of this subtitle if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.
8. Appeal to authority
Additionally, always assume a priori ontological supremacy and epistemological dominance by appealing to authority figures or accepted holier than thou “the case is closed” doctrine (this latter aspect is a next level strategy wherein one terminates discussion before it happens by claiming there is nothing left to discuss).
Repeat what authorities say verbatim. You can’t argue with authority, after all – authorities exist in an epistemological safe zone, above such petty concerns as evidence and integrity, and this is exactly how the Catholic church stamped its supremacy on the human race by positioning itself as the sole arbiter of god’s word. This is perhaps the central axis around which intelligent discussion and open acknowledgment of “dangerous” information is prevented from occurring.
When it comes to the vaccine “debate,” there are only two sides: the righteous believers and the blasphemous heretics. Choose wisely, lest you face eternal fiery damnation! (There’s a special circle of hell reserved for vaccine unbelievers.)
Authority figures are essential as guiding lights for any religious movement in maintaining its potency and direction.
“Tell us what we should say/think/do, O’ wise Leader!”
“The CDC says that MMR is safe and there is no autism link. You can’t argue with the CDC, they’re the experts in disease after all. Case closed. William Thompson? Never heard of him! CDC SPIDER? Huh?”
9. Fear monger. Scared people will buy your “solution” without thinking too hard about it. (See: Part 1, No. 6. Hypocrisy is Golden)
Always play on the widespread and disproportionate fear of diseases. Dramatise and over-inflate the imminent threat of relatively harmless and even unlikely-to-catch diseases. Fear is the great emotional grease that keeps the wheels of the vaccine industry turning at full pace. A public that steps out of fear (and the limbic brain) and into personal responsibility (and the frontal lobe) might actually have the nous to investigate the ACTUAL causes of diseases targeted by vaccines; whether they (or their children) are ever even REMOTELY likely to develop or contract a disease; and – heaven forbid – healthy, safe, natural ways of protecting themselves which won’t line the coffers of Big Pharma (we can’t be healing ourselves with products that aren’t patented and regulated, now can we?!).
Don’t acknowledge, for example, that for a relatively healthy child, the flu or measles just isn’t that big of a deal, and acquiring it naturally would actually fortify their immune system in the long run. NEVER explain how one contracts tetanus or any other disease, or, the likelihood it will ever actually happen (sales will plummet!).
10. Hold double standards
Imply (or claim outright) that conflicts of interest can only occur within “anti-vax” or “alternative health” camps and never occur in scientific (or other) circles espousing the virtues of vaccination. Claim that there are – and I quote – “people getting rich from the anti-vaccine industry,” instead of acknowledging that it is a grassroots movement driven by broken families, bereaved parents, human rights advocates, etc.
Promoting the idea of an anti-vaccine “industry” is a great way to create the illusion of sinister, impersonal corporate machinery at the heart of the grassroots pro-choice movement (another blatant inversion of reality, if ever there was one).
This technique dehumanizes the movement, dissociates it from the human element (namely bereaved families), and implies that it is financially driven (despite the fact that no one in their right mind would attempt “getting rich” by challenging the sanctity of vaccines in such a zealous cult-like pro-vaccine culture).
Provide no evidence of anyone ACTUALLY getting rich from this “industry.”
ALWAYS avoid mentioning the MASSIVE financial burdens endured by parents with severely vaccine damaged children, and the fact that most of them will never receive a shred of compensation for the harm done to them.
Do not mention the parents who HAVE received significant payouts as a result of losing a child, either to permanent brain damage, autoimmunity, or death.
When people get a little bit streetwise it becomes axiomatic that the largest creator of conflicts of interest is any entity generating billions in revenue (like Big Pharma) and therefore has the kind of budget to fund F-grade sellout bloggers, and buy off (or threaten – or kill) not only individual scientists, but exert control over entire institutions, thus, ensuring that their studies’ conclusions are “acceptable” before the research has even begun.
Vaccine manufacturers funding universities/colleges/research institutes creates a huge systemic problem – no one wants to bite the hand that feeds them, after all. Best to tinker with the numbers than admit openly that one has found a causal link between a vaccine and SIDS, autism, GI injury and dysfunction, autoimmunity, encephalitis, acute flaccid myelitis, etc., etc. (However, please note that there are dozens upon dozens of studies linking vaccines to adverse outcomes/damage. Most doctors choose not to read this material.)
10(a). Insist on “scientific evidence” wherever convenient but ignore gold standard science that refutes a blanket pro-vax stance
Ignore the dearth of legitimate research studies favourably comparing the health of vaccinated populations with the unvaxxed. ESPECIALLY ignore the studies, surveys, or doctors’ clinical observations that unvaccinated kids are much healthier and have less disease and developmental problems.
Try to justify the continuation of vaccination programs which are not supported by double-blind RCTs and long-term health comparisons between vaxxed and un-vaxxed populations as being “too important” to discontinue while safety and efficacy is actually measured. This begs the question: how do we know a vaccine has any value at all if it hasn’t been rigorously tested? When confronted with this logical fallacy, all a good advocate needs to do is resort to the usual rhetoric about how we “got rid” of polio (see item 11 for that one) thanks to vaccines, and they’re just so vital and amazing on all counts that we can’t possibly afford the “risk” of halting a vaccination program to establish its efficacy or safety.
Notice the presence once more of this odd circular reasoning, which REAL scientific endeavour offers an exit point from.
On the flip side, you can deride ALL alternative health modalities as not being “evidence-based,” (even though many blatantly ARE) while simultaneously ignoring the factually threadbare foundation of your own pro-vax ideology.
10(b). Ignore the fact that the entire Western medical system is biased towards the selling and promotion of Big Pharma’s wares
Gloss over the fact that doctors (and nurses) are not only systemically pressured to conform in their medical roles, but many doctors are also bribed and thus compromised by these conflicts of interest. They are not impartial sources of information. GPs today have been reduced in most cases to little more than glorified drug pushers, well heeled salespeople for Big Pharma. They’re notorious as “symptom matchers,” i.e., you tell them your symptoms and they match them to some pills. Forget about understanding your condition and why you have it (and how to eliminate it) – we have this great band-aid solution for you!
10(c). Hold double standards regarding vaccine ingredients
Insist that ingesting known toxins such as aluminum, mercury, latex, formaldehyde, polysorbate, is to be avoided in general, that environmental exposure should be limited, that you shouldn’t, say, eat fish containing high levels of mercury, and so forth, but maintain that these things are harmless when injected directly into a child’s bloodstream, because, vaccines are “safe and effective.” Provide no evidence, but repeat the false claim that “the studies have been done disproving the autism link,” as if the only thing that MIGHT go wrong in the human body as a result of vaccination is autism. Apart from that (which has been “disproved”), everything is hunky dory. Nothing to see here, move along.
Disregard the fact that vaccine doses are not weight-adjusted so that an “appropriate” amount of each cocktail of neurotoxins, infertility agents, and carcinogens is given to a newborn baby, versus a 200 pound man.
11. Denial is a winning strategy for cognitive stasis
Someone claims the emperor has no clothes? Uh oh, better cover thine eyes (instead of actually looking)!
Psychology 101 states that we will avoid events, situations, information, and realisations that might cause us pain, embarrassment, or one of those stomach-turning “I just had my world turned upside down by disturbing information” metanoietic moments – so the obvious solution to the rising tide of people questioning or avoiding vaccines is to live in denial. A few more generations and we may just become adapted to living permanently with our heads in the sand (if we last that long).
Denial may not be brave or lead to greater knowledge, but it’s sure handy when you want to dig your heels in and be an obdurate git!
Denial: a great tool when saving face is more important than facing facts.
In the long run, however, with the highest rates of infant vaccination in the world and the worst rate of infant mortality in the developed world, PLUS the autism rate projected at 1 in 2 in America by 2030, the ostrich methodology is NOT viable. America would be destroyed by such an insurmountable socio-economic burden if the nation chose not to break faith, and it is already in a state of cultural and socioeconomic decay as it is. Other nations following blindly in those footsteps will ultimately suffer the same fate.
America, it is wake up or PERISH as a first world nation. LISTEN to your whistleblowers! (As an aside, the fact that, in Trump, you now have a president who seemingly cares enough about your children to openly acknowledge there IS a vaccine-autism link is a major step in the right direction. It’s a humble start at least.)
11(a). Dismiss or ignore whistleblowers who confess to vaccine fraud and harm using any facile excuse available.
I.e., dismiss a confession of criminal activity (fraud, conspiracy, and coverup) as “crackpot” and “conspiracy theory.” Better yet, ignore this material outright to create the illusion no such people or information exists, to maintain the overall/fundamental false narrative.
Don’t feel limited by imagination here. Any mental contortion is welcome as long as it distracts from the evidence and testimony of people risking life, limb, and careers to warn parents of now well established causal links between vaccines and injury or death (MMR and HPV/Gardasil are just two excellent examples).
The most famous case is perhaps the (ongoing) William Thompson (ex-CDC) situation. He has pleaded to be subpoenaed so he can give his testimony in a formal/official setting, but for some reason confessions of criminal activity, conspiracy, and coverup at the highest levels of government in medicine are not of interest when they pertain to vaccines. (Who’d have thunk it?!) Of course, you must also disregard or downplay the CDC SPIDER whistleblower group of at least a DOZEN scientists who recently expressed disgust at the comprehensive and endemic corruption at the CDC.
Vaccines and vaccine manufacturers always seem to have a “get out of jail free” card – both literally and figuratively (well, okay, vaccine makers don’t get sent to jail in the first place, even when the evidence demands it, which is the problem).
Pro-vaxxers don’t want you to read confessions like this one by an ex-vaccine developer who said this to Jon Rappoport during an interview: “If I had a child now, the last thing I would allow is vaccination. I would move out of the state if I had to. I would change the family name. I would disappear. With my family…[I]f push came to shove, I would go on the move.”
Militant pro-vaxxers also don’t want you to hear what whistleblower Dr Judy Mikovits has to say of her shocking findings in the lab or why the American government destroyed her work and her life.
11(b). Dismiss ALL doctors who openly air concerns about vaccine safety (or “worse”) as quacks, crackpots, etc
The ONLY doctors who have concerns about vaccines are, by definition, quacks and crackpots. The fact that they have the same medical qualifications – and often substantially MORE than pro-vax doctors – is “irrelevant.”
How does one become a certified quack/crackpot? Practice bad medicine? Harm patients?
Just question the holy sacrament of vaccination on ANY level, and – hey, presto! – you are now magically transmogrified into a filthy quack/heretic.
Got more medical credentials and knowledge of immunology and natural healing than the pro-vax doctors? Too bad, because you’re a quack, and quacks don’t get a say (that would be “false balance”). Meanwhile, doctors who DO cause harm through severe vaccine reactions or death are given a pat on the back for serving the “greater good.”
11(c). Never, EVER, spend any serious time trying to understand the multi-faceted power structure that manipulates humanity on every level of existence – that requires effort, after all.
All together now: “Oh, he’s another tinfoil hat-wearing conspiracy theorist!”
Connecting the dots on a global level is a bad idea if you want to maintain blanket pro-vax faith. Under no circumstances investigate the population control/reduction agenda. The fact that it’s literally carved in stone (see: Georgia Guidestones [below] and R.C. Christian) and openly advocated by billionaire self-appointed “stewards” of humanity is best avoided. Ignore Bill Gates’ TED Talk wherein he openly advocated the use of vaccination programs to control population (a strategy being heavily utilised in the developing world WITHOUT informed consent). Don’t learn about George Soros or the crucial role of the Rockefeller family in shaping the institution of mainstream medicine. (The list goes on.)
Disregard all serious investigators and whistleblowers who discuss these matters and dismiss them with the tried and true favourite “tinfoil hat-wearing conspiracy theorist.”
Ye good vaccine believers, I extol thee to never, under any circumstances whatsoever, investigate whether there is actually a conspiracy against natural health practitioners and natural remedies in general, let alone try to understand where the psychology underlying it may originate from. Curiosity killed the cat, and much as comparative religion has a way of extinguishing the potential for naive fundamentalist-like faith in one of the world’s many “one true gods,” investigating the evidence against vaccines over a long period of time similarly tends to temper one’s faith in that much loved medical convention.
Don’t do it.
Your loving government has everything under control.
Their thoughts are your thoughts.
A Final Plea
Before I finish with a reference (image at bottom) to the population control agenda, consider this quote from Todd M. Elsner’s book What The Pharmaceutical Companies Don’t Want You To Know About Vaccines:
In the current [American] National Vaccine Schedule, in the first 6 years of life your child receives the following Vaccine Ingredients:
17,500 mcg 2-phenoxyethanol (Bug Repellant, some brands of Antifreeze)
5,700 mcg aluminum (a known neurotoxin)
Unknown amounts of fetal bovine serum (aborted cow blood)
801.6 mcg formaldehyde (carcinogen, embalming agent)
23,250 mcg gelatin (ground up animal carcasses)
500 mcg human albumin (human blood)
760 mcg of monosodium L-glutamate (causes obesity & diabetis)
Unknown amounts of MRC-5 cells (aborted human babies)
Over 10 mcg neomycin (antibiotic)
Over 0.075 mcg polymyxin B (antibiotic)
Over 560 mcg polysorbate 80 (carcinogen)
116 mcg potassium chloride (used in lethal injection to shut down the heart and stop breathing)
188 mcg potassium phosphate (liquid fertilizer agent)
260 mcg sodium bicarbonate (baking soda)
70 mcg sodium borate (Borax, used for cockroach control)
54,100 mcg of sodium chloride (table salt)
Unknown amounts of sodium citrate (food additive)
Unknown amounts of sodium hydroxide (Danger! Corrosive)
2,800 mcg sodium phosphate (toxic to any organism)
Unknown amounts of sodium phosphate monobasic monohydrate (toxic to any organism)
32,000 mcg sorbitol (Not to be injected)
0.6 mcg streptomycin (antibiotic)
Over 40,000 mcg sucrose (cane sugar)
35,000 mcg yeast protein (fungus)
5,000 mcg urea (metabolic waste from human urine)
Other chemical residuals
This list is not comprehensive either. For one thing, it doesn’t really get into unintentional contaminants or retroviral fragments. Do you suppose that individuals predisposed to deficiencies in flushing toxins from their bodies might not be impacted by all of this garbage being dumped in the bloodstream? And what of newborn babies in general – without a mature defense against these substances? How about newborn babies with inherited flaws or susceptibilities in their detox mechanisms? Are we thinking yet? Could these considerations be connected to the massive groundswell of support encountered by the VAXXED bus as it tours America gathering vaccination horror stories in disturbing abundance?
It’s the 21st century now. You have the internet, so what is the excuse for being two centuries behind the times on the vaccine fraud (many doctors opposed Jenner’s fabrications from day one). Let’s acknowledge the last 200 years of evidence and the millions of anguished parents’ voices before we blindly fulfill the 1-in-2 autism prophecy through the vaccine religion and the eugenicists have their insane way.
Polio –The Disease and the Vac from History. Editorial for the Vaccine Risk Awareness Network (VRAN) Newsletter, June-Oct. 2001
Edda West — 10/20/2001http://www.vaclib.org/basic/polioedda.htm